From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 9 14:14: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509DD37BEE9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 14:13:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e49LjDH27095; Tue, 9 May 2000 14:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 14:45:13 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Brandon D. Valentine" Cc: David Miller , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Server Farms? Message-ID: <20000509144512.L19135@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000509141329.G19135@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from bandix@looksharp.net on Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:56:27PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Brandon D. Valentine [000509 14:27] wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > >Yup and yup, subscribe to the security mailing list and the CVS > >mailing list, take special note of all changes done to RELENG_4 > >(-stable) when you see any special ones that you think may be > >essential, then run your update. > > I am not sure whether this has been brought up before or not, but here > it goes. I am not at all familiar with how the CVS commit messsages are > funneled to cvs-all@FreeBSD.org and admit that before I ask this. Is it > not possible to break out a seperate cvs-stable@FreeBSD.org mailing list > that would contain all cvs commits sans HEAD. Most of the committs > happen to HEAD, but a good many STABLE users subscribe to cvs-all > watching and waiting for commits to whichever STABLE branch they are on. > These MFCs are all they are interested in and sending them the full > commit mailing list seems like a waste of bandwidth. Those active > developers on the HEAD branch and those who track -CURRENT can still > subscribe to the full cvs-all list, but it would enable those who are > only interested in commits to RELENG_2_2, RELENG_3 and RELENG_4 to > conserve bandwidth and mail spool space. Thoughts? Caveats? use procmail. a non-HEAD commit email will look like this: -- dillon 2000/05/09 10:41:25 PDT Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) sys/kern imgact_shell.c kern_exec.c sys/sys imgact.h sysent.h sys/i386/linux imgact_linux.c linux.h linux_sysvec.c Log: MFC i386/linux/imgact_linux.c 1.36 and friends - fix #! script exec under linux emulation to look for script binary in /compat/linux first. Revision Changes Path 1.21.2.1 +2 -6 src/sys/kern/imgact_shell.c 1.107.2.2 +38 -29 src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c 1.22.2.1 +5 -2 src/sys/sys/imgact.h 1.27.2.1 +2 -1 src/sys/sys/sysent.h 1.35.2.1 +1 -3 src/sys/i386/linux/imgact_linux.c 1.41.2.1 +3 -1 src/sys/i386/linux/linux.h 1.55.2.1 +56 -3 src/sys/i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c -- Notice the (Branch: RELENG_4). -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message