From owner-freebsd-doc  Tue Jul  2 14:32:59 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C613037B49B; Tue,  2 Jul 2002 14:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.50.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4EC2A43E39; Tue,  2 Jul 2002 14:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marc@blackend.org)
Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/ - 15/04/02) with ESMTP id g62LUlrs035750;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 23:30:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org)
Received: (from marc@localhost)
	by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g62LUlDJ035749;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 23:30:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from marc)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 23:30:47 +0200
From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>
To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Extra crud in the doc tree
Message-ID: <20020702233047.B35465@abigail.blackend.org>
References: <20020702170932.426a899b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20020702170932.426a899b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>; from trhodes@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:09:32PM -0400
X-Useless-Header: blackend.org
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-doc.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-doc>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-doc>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:09:32PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> Greetings doc people!
> 
> I've been wondering why we have duplicate directories in our tree
> on freefall?  Well, not duplicate, as the difference is only an
> underscore character ``_'' between ISO and the number (ie:
> 
> en_US.ISO8859-1
> en_US.ISO_8859-1)

It's old locale names scheme. Read for example 20020105 entry in
UPDATING.

> 
> Should these be removed?  Can these be removed?  How high is up?
>

Maybe :)

Btw European locales, *.ISO8859-1, for countries using Euro character
should be renamed/changed to *.ISO8859-15
But it'd be a big change in all locales system...

Marc

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message