From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:50:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3FE16A404 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C240A43D5F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k49EoNQg021544 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:50:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k49EoN8K021543; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:50:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:50:23 GMT Message-Id: <200605091450.k49EoN8K021543@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: Subject: Re: ports/96149: [patch] Make sysutils/bpm handle OPTIONS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Panagiotis Astithas List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:50:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/96149; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Panagiotis Astithas To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/96149: [patch] Make sysutils/bpm handle OPTIONS Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:43:55 +0300 Doh, I never received your followup for some reason. Looking at the zenity port it appears that it will bring along a few low-level GNOME stuff (ORBit2, gconf2, gnomehier, etc.), not the real heavyweights (gnomemedia, gnomelibs, gnomeapplets, etc.). Naturally, users that get bpm as a gnome2-power-tools dependency won't care, but others might. Unfortunately I haven't found anything similar, but DE-agnostic. Since bpm is a desktop application, I personally don't mind a little extra cruft every now and then in exchange for unique functionality. Perhaps this should be considered a temporary measure, until proper OPTIONS handling is implemented in bpm without extra helper applications.