From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 30 14:09:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83FA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7C043D5F
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:08:44 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from pir@pir.net)
Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim)
	id 1Amgoe-00059L-00
	for freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:08:44 -0500
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:08:44 -0500
From: Peter Radcliffe <pir@pir.net>
To: freebsd-mobile <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040130220844.GM14384@pir.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-mobile <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
References: <3576.1075500289@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3576.1075500289@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-fish: <darwin><
X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail.
Subject: Re: Thinkpad T30 modem (Agere AC'97)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD <freebsd-mobile.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:09:02 -0000

Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov> probably said:
> though the NIC on that cardlet works just fine.

I, and some other people, had some issues with that card until giving
it a firmware upgrade (not from IBM, more recent than their available
firmware) and a small kernel patch to add DELAY(1); in a couple of
places.

All the details are in the archives.

P.

-- 
pir