From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 16 00:01:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEB316A4CE; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA7443D54; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:01:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marks@dell-laptop.6bone.nl) Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 265048DDB5; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:01:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BE08DDAB; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:01:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dell-laptop.6bone.nl (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by birch.ripe.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with SMTP id i3G71pc4002376; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:01:51 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 812 invoked by uid 1001); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:12:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:12:50 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos To: Nate Lawson Message-ID: <20040416061250.GA792@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <20040414051207.GK58667@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20040413222717.O80191@root.org> <20040414.001039.116586661.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040414092553.F83452@root.org> <20040415135755.GA925@laptop.6bone.nl> <20040415133527.G92275@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040415133527.G92275@root.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Status: U 0.252862 / 0.0 / 0.0 / disabled X-RIPE-Signature: c3480b852bd58d4c331072819e2f68ef cc: acpi@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Experiences with new PCI code X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:01:53 -0000 On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 01:36:49PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > So you're saying your system doesn't stay in S3 but immediately wakes up > even with the latest -current? Yes. > Try commenting out all callers to acpi_enable_wake*(), including in > acpi_lid, etc. Perhaps a premature wake event is being triggered. Had tried that before, just to be sure, I did it again now. There are actually only two instances: acpi_lid and acpi_button. I disabled the calls to acpi_device_enable_wake_event() from the _suspend() functions. No luck ... Mark