From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 06:43:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C816C106566C for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F83F8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so1789562eyg.13 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:43:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.5.74 with SMTP id 50mr3200266eek.141.1309070608844; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.48.80 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:43:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [76.104.147.221] In-Reply-To: <4E05CF72.2040800@snap.net.nz> References: <20110622134158.GA2679@e4310> <808833D7-FAD4-46E2-ACB6-71993AD048FB@my.gd> <4E05CF72.2040800@snap.net.nz> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:43:28 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: NFS zfs serveur (hardware question) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:43:30 -0000 On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Peter Toth wrote: > There is still a way to increase NFS performance in 9.0 (without a ZIL > SSD) by setting zfs property "sync=disabled", which will disable > synchronous writes - comes with some risks, research it before switching > it off. Also, this will only disable sync for the ZFS filesystem not for > the whole pool. Thanks, I'll look into that. I do appreciate that ZFS tries to be more careful about sync writes than most filesystems. But I also have users who expect "tar xvf" to complete in a reasonable amount of time, and having the ZIL enabled reduces file creation performance by a factor of ten. ;)