From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 7 10:02:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA21234 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 10:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lestat.nas.nasa.gov (lestat.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.50.29]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA21228 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 10:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lestat.nas.nasa.gov (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA08248; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607071657.JAA08248@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> X-Authentication-Warning: lestat.nas.nasa.gov: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Amancio Hasty Cc: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey), michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock), hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Subject: Re: gcc lies? Reply-To: Jason Thorpe From: Jason Thorpe Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 09:57:00 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 07 Jul 1996 01:30:51 -0700 Amancio Hasty wrote: > Dumb question , is gcc-1.42 a lot faster than gcc-2.x? gcc 1.x compiles things faster. gcc 2.x produces better code. Some people think there's a trade-off to be made there... -- save the ancient forests - http://www.bayarea.net/~thorpej/forest/ -- Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912 NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935 Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939