From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jan 22  9:42:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EECA37B69B
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA40017;
	Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:41:43 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:41:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200101221741.MAA40017@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: sys/time.h w/ timespec stuff
In-Reply-To: <20010121011326.D3002@puck.firepipe.net>
References: <20010121011326.D3002@puck.firepipe.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 01:13:26 -0500, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> said:

> So now, maybe someone can answer my question: why is timespec _KERNEL?

It's not.  Some of the namespace pollution associated with it is.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message