From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 16:36:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9F516A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:36:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1794B43D8B for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:36:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBJGa5P6080730; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:36:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBJGa4Tv080729; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:36:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:36:04 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Rink Springer Message-ID: <20051219163604.GC72940@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Rink Springer References: <20051219134052.GB68985@il.fontys.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051219134052.GB68985@il.fontys.nl> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] FreeBSD/xbox nve(4) support X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:36:33 -0000 On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:40:52PM +0100, Rink Springer wrote: > PS. I get 10MB/sec on my XBOX while transferring files, but the nve(4) > driver will cause 7500 interrupts/sec and burn up 30% interrupt time > (as well as 50% system time or so). Is this 'normal' behaviour of > nve(4) ? While the nForce NIC isn't a good one - it is much better than that on my normal PeeCee's. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?