From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 10 20:10:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BF437B502 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:10:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9B3Ani16971; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:10:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA32653; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:10:48 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010110310.VAA32653@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Silbersack Subject: Re: ncurses buffer overflows (fwd) Cc: Trevor Johnson , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:09:33 CDT." References: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:10:48 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message Mike Silbersack writes: : Is the patch just to not read .terminfo from the current directory when : executing setuid+setgid apps? (Just checking if it's the same as the : patch that openbsd has applied.) There are several things that were fixed in this round of patches. I think that this is one of them, but I have it on my list of things to check once Peter imports the new ncurses. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message