From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 3 20:58:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from user1.erieonline.com (user1.erieonline.com [63.164.22.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A0137B8BC; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 20:58:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Smith@ian.org) Received: from localhost (iansmith@localhost) by user1.erieonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA17994; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:58:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:58:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Smith@ian.org X-Sender: iansmith@user1.erieonline.com To: Stable FBSD Cc: questions FBSD Subject: Bridging and IPFilter in 4.x In-Reply-To: <398A3814.FF8C39F6@oduurl.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Are there plans (or is there currently) to do OpenBSD style bridge0 interfaces to allow bridging to be integrated easier into diffrent utilities? Currently I use IPFilter but have no way to work with bridged packets. I won't want to switch to IPFW as it does not have all the filter and nat rules that I need. It would be nice if bridging and diverting were done via bridge# and divert# interfaces.. but I assume that is not something that is easy to fix? Not trying to flame, but should I consider using OpenBSD instead if my needs are IPFilter and bridging? Thanks! -- Smith@ian.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message