From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 31 8: 0: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D6937B625 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA31126; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007311500.IAA31126@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki Subject: Re: ports/20270: libtool ldconfig and shlibs Reply-To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/20270; it has been noted by GNATS. From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki To: reg@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/20270: libtool ldconfig and shlibs Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:51:46 +0900 At Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:06:18 -0700, Jeremy Lea wrote: > It's also harmless. Other than in this case. I think we have multiple > problems here: > > 1. ldconfig should be ignoring non existant directories. > 2. bsd.port.mk should run ldconfig before @dirrms. > 3. libtool shouldn't be running ldconfig for modules (xmms's plugins > are compiled with --avoid-version). > > I'll fix the last problem. (1) This would be harmful. we would be hard to find a typo such as "/usr/X11R6/lbi", so current behavior is better. (2) Hmm, binaries linked against libraries installed non-standard place should be linked with -rpath doesn't it(and don't ldconfig -m its directory)? This is a design issue of FreeBSD system (ldconfig VS -rpath) so leave it as is for now. :-) (3) This is good solusion I think. BTW, would you please update libtool to 1.3.5 if it is better than 1.3.4? -- FUJISHIMA Satsuki To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message