From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 12 15:54:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6193416A4CE; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:54:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com
	[194.25.134.18])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E893343D39; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:54:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net)
Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de 
	by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 1CSdlF-0002cY-04; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:53 +0100
Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net
	(XV+RvrZZoe8BtP7uPydWIZLNpWGrxs2c6tkJsSu8T56KqV0c7rsc4Z@[84.128.203.243]) by
	fmrl11.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 1CSdl5-1wmJqS0; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:43 +0100
Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	iACFsw53061674;	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:58 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net)
Received: (from www@localhost)iACFswdZ061673;
	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:58 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net: www set sender to
	Alexander@Leidinger.net using -f
Received: from 141.113.101.32 ([141.113.101.32]) 
	by netchild.homeip.net (IMP) with HTTP 
	for <Alexander@Leidinger.net@Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net>;
	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:57 +0100
Message-ID: <1100274897.4194dcd1d67d6@netchild.homeip.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:57 +0100
From: Alexander@Leidinger.net
To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
References: <6857.1100271323@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<20041112160137.X42945@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
In-Reply-To: <20041112160137.X42945@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 / FreeBSD-4.10
X-Originating-IP: 141.113.101.32
X-ID: XV+RvrZZoe8BtP7uPydWIZLNpWGrxs2c6tkJsSu8T56KqV0c7rsc4Z@t-dialin.net
X-TOI-MSGID: ac66a8e8-7b9c-4892-9188-505308371023
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:54:55 -0000

Zitat von Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>:

> PK>>If yes: we have some ports which aren't -j safe, so this would violate
> PK>>POLA.
> PK>
> PK>That is what "make -B" is for.
>
> Or .NOTPARALLEL

I'm not talking about /usr/ports/category/port/Makefile, I'm talking about
/usr/ports/category/port/work/tarball_dir/**/Makefile. We don't have
control about those Makefiles.

As much as I like a flag in the Makefile of a port which indicates
that a port can't be build with -j, we don't have this and the last time
this topic was discussed there was a strong objection to something like
this.

So this change may break procedures which worked so far.

Bye,
Alexander.