From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 02:38:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4351016A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:38:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE6B43D45 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp35-138.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.35.138])iBU2csRF038282; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:08:54 +1030 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: scott@sremick.net, Ramiro Aceves , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:08:53 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20041229141544.48982.qmail@web53603.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041229141544.48982.qmail@web53603.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412301308.53580.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: Man pages take forever on slow machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:38:58 -0000 On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:45 am, Scott I. Remick wrote: > --- Ramiro Aceves wrote: > > My pentium 100 MHz with 16 MB RAM runs smoothly with FreeBSD 4.10 , it > > even runs fvwm under X. I am not able to run 5.3 install, as I only have > > 16MB, I was suspecting that I need more memory for the install proccess. > > The reason I wanted 5.3 was so that, if my dad gets hooked and wants to > progress, he doesn't have to unlearn the 4.x way of things after just > learning it. Unfortunately this old system is the only spare one we had > lying around. > > Now, I can understand needing more than 16MB to install. I can understand > that there'd be a lot of swapping. I can understand it's going to be a lot > slower than what I'm used to. But what I don't understand is how I could > wake up this morning and it's STILL working on that man page. That seems to > suggest not just proportional slowness, but that there's something horribly > wrong. > What is your total memory space? Do you have enough swap space? All hell can break loose if physical memory + swap space is too small. Malcolm