From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 29 14:44:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from postoffice.aims.com.au (advanc2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.119.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0894F37B422 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:44:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@aims.com.au) Received: from postoffice.aims.com.au (nts-ts1.aims.private [192.168.10.2]) by postoffice.aims.com.au with ESMTP id f4TLibr57637 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:44:38 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris@aims.com.au) Received: from ntsts1 by aims.com.au with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:44:08 +1000 Reply-To: From: "Chris Knight" To: Cc: Subject: RE: nsswitch progress Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 07:44:06 +1000 Message-ID: <067601c0e888$7d347500$020aa8c0@aims.private> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010529163131.C461@shade.nectar.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal X-Return-Path: chris@aims.com.au X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Howdy, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacques A. Vidrine [mailto:n@nectar.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2001 7:32 > To: Chris Knight > Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: nsswitch progress > > > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:54:10AM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > > If someone with commit privs is interested, I have a set of patches > > based on the 4.1-STABLE patches that apply cleanly to 4.3. This > > should be slightly quicker to merge with -STABLE. > > Are these patches equivalent to the functionality in -CURRENT (i.e. > straight port of the NetBSD code: files, NIS, Hesiod only)? > > Or are they based on what is found on my web page today (i.e. > prototype with dynamic linking, reentrant interfaces, nss_ldap > support)? > The patches are based on what's found on your Web page. > If the former, I wouldn't mind if they were committed if the rest of > the world wants it. > > If the latter, that should not be committed to -STABLE under any > circumstances, and probably not to -CURRENT either (else I would have > done it, instead of putting it off until I could complete the work). > Understood. I didn't realise that the code already committed to -CURRENT differs from that found on your Web page. My mistake. Apologies to everyone for the misunderstanding. > Cheers, > -- > Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / > nectar@FreeBSD.org > Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator AIMS Independent Computer Professionals Tel: +61 3 6334 6664 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.aims.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message