From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 21:47:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103F416A406 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [67.139.134.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8917413C4B4 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 36553 invoked by uid 98); 1 Mar 2007 21:47:26 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by o2.hostbaby.com (envelope-from , uid 1013) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.7/2690. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.135919 secs); 01 Mar 2007 21:47:26 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ceo@l-i-e.com via o2.hostbaby.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.135919 secs) Received: from localhost (HELO l-i-e.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2007 21:47:26 -0000 Received: from 216.230.84.67 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com) by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:47:26 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <41224.216.230.84.67.1172785646.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: References: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:47:26 -0600 (CST) From: "Richard Lynch" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: defrag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:47:25 -0000 On Thu, March 1, 2007 3:35 pm, Ivan Voras wrote: > Steve Franks wrote: >> How come I never hear defrag come up as a topic, and can't find >> anything related to defrag in the ports tree? Is it really not an >> issue on UFS? Can someone point me to an explantion if so? I've been told that most modern file systems have much better allocation routines and/or automated defragmentation as needed. So that the need to do "defrag" is essentially almost 0 for almost all users. No promises that this answer is correct, but it sure sounded good to me. -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some starving artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So?