From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 22:57:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F50C106566B for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37AA8FC14 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7TMv7Rr089071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:57:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E5C1943.5060202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:57:07 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Macklem References: <1482338417.485168.1314632834055.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <1482338417.485168.1314632834055.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:57:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS mountd version 3 over TCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:57:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 08/29/11 11:47, Rick Macklem wrote: >> I think it did. Lookup of ".." was failing. I think that was because >> ni_strictrelative (added for capabilities) wasn't initialized and >> happened to be non-zero. > >> Please try this patch and let us know if it helps: That fixed it, thanks! >> Thanks for reporting this, I'm not sure when these fields not >> being initialized would have been noticed otherwise, rick No problem, thanks for the quick response. If I see any other issues I'll be sure to report them. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOXBlDAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhWzQH/AjTSRYzw93cn78BXwOpUVKJ nS22ZH/fFdW6Jvaa/Ph1xHj6P04zjOlIrxTEIEnQvDlWKJkdnG/JwIuvOKFHmyiu VpFBDReTNSPO3wN2t3pAOz89Kfs3mVkY1AvFly5RJ+CmZAzo/zafamS0UHICIm49 wSDb/KDo+hkEF+5Iluqsbm453wU0PiDjmPhlkvuFtGkn7kuuoU2r+inBFT5AzYlO 1iX79uKRJEywcaVFBbL4QiEVG6w/SWI+mUIy+TZmfAtaQGSQMJ2sEpGlcYSSzZ8E 4BLf9C2BPE+IWR8ssw1eF99+W39yCszpaauXhgwX1Tjrv/Ae0PBDONd4H1ejekQ= =T0ct -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----