From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 3 10:35:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kobayashi.uits.iupui.edu (kobayashi.uits.iupui.edu [134.68.5.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4372137B41C; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:35:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ajk@localhost) by kobayashi.uits.iupui.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g33IZBB10777; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 13:35:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ajk@iu.edu) To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Norikatsu Shigemura , kris@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security Makefile ports/security/pam_sshMakefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist References: <20020403092934.C94469@xor.obsecurity.org> <200204031745.g33HjMNg026113@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20020403094843.A6897@xor.obsecurity.org> From: ajk@iu.edu (Andrew J. Korty) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:35:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20020403094843.A6897@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:48:43 -0800") Message-ID: Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kris Kennaway writes: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:45:22AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: >> article in <20020403092934.C94469@xor.obsecurity.org> >> kris@obsecurity.org wrote: >> >>>>> Humm.. The pam_ssh port was dropped in favor of the one from >>>>> OpenPAM, but OpenPAM is not MFC'd to 4-STABLE yet. Please >>>>> back out or MFC OpenPAM to 4-STABLE. >>>> >>>> Sorry? pam_ssh.c is not part of OpenPAM, it's a separate module which >>>> has been in both -current and -stable for ages. >> >> Sorry. pam_ssh is not part of OpenPAM. But 4-STABLE pam_ssh >> (/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh) is not maintained. >> Please MFC pam_ssh to 4-STABLE. > > OK, thanks for clarifying. We should either do this or put back the > port. Andrew, what do you think? Hm, I thought DES was maintaining all versions of pam_ssh. If not, I suppose an MFC would be in order unless it has been modified significantly in -CURRENT. I'm not a committer, though, so I don't know who would do it. If necessary, I will get pam_ssh working again in -CURRENT and submit a patch. -- Andrew J. Korty, Principal Security Engineer, GCIA Office of the Vice President for Information Technology Indiana University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message