From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 11 12:02:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADA516A4CE; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3BJ2QAN025601; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:02:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Message-Id: <200404111902.i3BJ2QAN025601@green.homeunix.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jaye Mathisen In-Reply-To: Message from Jaye Mathisen <20040411003729.GB60706@backmaster.cdsnet.net> From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:02:24 -0400 Sender: green@green.homeunix.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monumentally slow directory performance. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:02:29 -0000 Jaye Mathisen wrote: > I know. if I start off with an empty dir, it goes really really fast > until I get around 2000-2500 or so. And then it just gets slower and > slower. > > If it's samba, I have no idea what. I'm running a current samba, > pretty much the default config. On large files I see 12-13MB/second. > > If my switch supported jumbo frames I'm sure it'd be even faster. Is this an ATA drive with hw.ata.wc set to 0? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\