From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 3 00:00:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DF41065692 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658168FC12 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA300G1t008128 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nA300GDr008127; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:16 GMT Message-Id: <200911030000.nA300GDr008127@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Best Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137332: add caution messages to some adobe products X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Best List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/137332; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Best To: , Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137332: add caution messages to some adobe products Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:54:47 +0100 (CET) is there really a need for this? just because these ports/applications aren't maintained any more this doesn't necessarily require a warning to be issued during port build/installation. the latest security bulletin for acroread8 recommends using version 8.1.7 which is the version in ports! the latest security bulletin for acroread9 recommends using version 9.2 which is the version in ports! the latest security bulletin for flash9 recommends using version 9.0.246.0 which is the version in ports! i couldn't quite catch which version of flash10 is in the ports, but the latest security bulletin recommends using version 10.0.32.18! maybe you could report exactly which ports are suffering from security flaws. these ports should then be marked IGNORE. unless there aren't any security issues present in connection with these ports i vote for closing the PR. alex