From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 21 14:53:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598DB106567E for ; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987D28FC1A for ; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA15193; Thu, 21 May 2009 17:53:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <4A156AD7.8000003@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:53:11 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090406) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Louis Mamakos References: <3c1674c90905201459k19776d53n309b2abeab0f8d0a@mail.gmail.com> <200905202209.n4KM9Bcg094853@lava.sentex.ca> <3c1674c90905201541n65f997e6jaa20d93bf566fb98@mail.gmail.com> <68BDAD74-021A-4169-B003-21A2BCF2AD5C@transsys.com> In-Reply-To: <68BDAD74-021A-4169-B003-21A2BCF2AD5C@transsys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS MFC heads up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:53:20 -0000 on 21/05/2009 17:12 Louis Mamakos said the following: > FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS > merged in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed one > weirdness that could be confusion on my part - I'm no longer seeing > snapshots when I do 'zfs list'. There's a UI change in the zfs command, > and to see snapshots, you have to explicitly ask for them: > > zfs list -t snapshot > > scared me there for a moment.. Do 'zpool get all ', it might give you a hint as to why :-) -- Andriy Gapon