From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Feb 3 11:12:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA14312 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 11:12:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from sendero.i-connect.net ([206.190.144.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA14297; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 11:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from shimon@localhost) by sendero.i-connect.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) id MAA01626; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:07:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199702010403.XAA02913@dyson.iquest.net> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:35:38 -0800 (PST) Organization: iConnect Corp. From: Simon Shapiro To: "John S. Dyson" Subject: Re: XXXminpys question Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, dyson@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi John S. Dyson; On 01-Jan-97 you wrote: > > > > > > Hi John S. Dyson; On 31-Jan-97 you wrote: > > > It will require some restructuring of the pbuf (physical I/O buffer) > > > code, but isn't that bad to do. It has been in my queue for a while. > > > If the driver-savvy people can work out a way to query the driver for > > > the maximum I/O size, I can/will implement the upper level changes. > > > > > > John Dyson > > > > Is this not the purpose of the xxx_minphys entry point to the driver? > > > > Simon > > > Yes, except is that indeed the *right* way to do it? I am suggesting > that we review that choice first. Coming to think about it, this really describes max_transfer, not min_phys. No? Simon