From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 06:52:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF6B16A4CE; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:52:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lithium.plan-ix.de (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C34F43D41; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from braukmann@tse-online.de) Received: from localhost (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) by lithium.plan-ix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21672EDE4F; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:51:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.plan-ix.de ([212.37.39.35]) by localhost (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 08885-05; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:51:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.225.100] (p50824F73.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.130.79.115]) by lithium.plan-ix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776062EC66F; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:51:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:51:40 +0200 From: Andreas Braukmann To: Bill Paul Message-ID: <33150000.1087541499@cage.int.unixxinu.de> In-Reply-To: <20040618015117.0A85216A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040618015117.0A85216A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at plan-ix.de cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek RT8139 (onboard) - failed to receive packet in loopback mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:52:36 -0000 On 06/18/04 01:51:17 +0000 Bill Paul wrote: > Please try the code located at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/re thanks. The patched if_re.c doesn't compile. You added a member rl_link to the struct rl_softc in pci/if_rlreg.h, didn't you? I'd appreciate getting the appropriate patch for if_rlreg.h. Many thanks, Andreas