From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 7 19:12:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA09592 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:12:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from hobbes.saturn-tech.com (drussell@drussell.internode.net [198.161.228.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA09563 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:11:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drussell@saturn-tech.com) Received: from localhost (drussell@localhost) by hobbes.saturn-tech.com (8.8.4/8.8.2) with SMTP id UAA18215; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 20:11:04 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 20:11:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Doug Russell To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: imp@village.org, dg@root.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS In-Reply-To: <199710061510.IAA00329@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > *PLEASE*PLEASE*PLEASE* listen to Rod. The kernels after 2.2.5-RELEASE > > > should be called 2.2.5-STABLE. > > > > Or we could always call it 2.2.x-STABLE, to indicate that it is the most > > recent of the 2.2 branch (which is therefore, the 2.2.x branch...) > > Won't do you any good, you wont know if your post 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.5, > kinda defeats the purpose of REVISION :-(. True, but it fixes the origional problem of user CONFUSION... (2.2 vs 2.2.0 problem...) You'd have to tack a revision on there somewhere to fix the problem of "exactly what revision IS this system anyway?" FreeBSD 2.2.x-STABLE (rrrrr) r = some revision identification scheme Later......