From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 20:40:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C24D16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:40:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E5743D4C for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) iACKemYo021894; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)iACKemkp021893; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:40:48 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Ryan Sommers , FreeBSD Current Mailinglist Message-ID: <20041112204048.GB21642@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20041112163605.GA20057@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4194E990.8080701@gamersimpact.com> <20041112165852.GA20193@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20041112202559.GB830@empiric.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041112202559.GB830@empiric.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [PATCH] mouse.4: cuaa0 renamed to cuad0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:40:49 -0000 On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:25:59PM -0800, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:58:52AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > These are OBVIOUS patches. Anyone of the 300+ committers > > can commit these in a matter of seconds. phk should have > > updated the docs as part of his cuaa* to cuad* rename. > > Then why post non-critical documentation patches to an extremely busy > list where it's OBVIOUS that they aren't going to get any more attention > than they would if they were submitted as PRs? > There are 290 docs PR. At least 1, dates back to 11/99. Another that dates back to 2000 and assigned to bms@ is still opened. Come on! This is a no brainer document change. In the time it took you to write the above snide remark, you could have committed the fix. -- Steve