From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 18:40:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B0116A46D for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C827B43D48 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8LIeAl7057413 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8LIeA3X057412; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:10 GMT Message-Id: <200509211840.j8LIeA3X057412@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Juergen Lock Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86379: Port emulators/qemu: broken package if compiled with kqemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen Lock List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:40:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86379; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Juergen Lock To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86379: Port emulators/qemu: broken package if compiled with kqemu Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:29:28 +0200 On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:22:50PM +0200, Bjrn Knig wrote: > I forgot to mention that you have to specify FORCE_PACKAGE to build > the package. There are several scenarios where it is possible to > create a package, e.g. installing the software on identically > configured machines or building the software in a jail. Yes that patch looks like a commit candidate to me. Juergen