From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 23 13:51:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDEC4D85; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:202::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13A518AD; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3EEB9209AF12; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:11 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:11 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: gnupg & pinentry Message-ID: <20141223135111.GA45509@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Mark Felder , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20141222094630.GF52267@xtaz.uk> <1419342257.1161578.206107753.2999EC08@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1419342257.1161578.206107753.2999EC08@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:15 -0000 On Dec 23 07:44, Mark Felder wrote: > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option. > >Anyone up for a weekend challenge? :-) There has been another thread on this mailing list discussing making the port honour the WITHOUT_X11 and OPTIONS_UNSET+=X11 options from make.conf which would make it only depend on security/pinentry-curses instead of security/pinentry. This seems like a good solution to me. It would mean if one of those options is set it will only drag in a single dependancy rather than all the X11 libraries and GTK. -- Matt