From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 17 20:41:35 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 9CB0A1065770; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:41:35 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20120217204135.GA47274@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201202171152.q1HBq3vV020660@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4F3E843B.3000309@p6m7g8.com>
	<CADLo83-yh9tCV2oSKgcTErEnLqMM-u_Ga5YJFTL1JzCaqJsPFw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-yh9tCV2oSKgcTErEnLqMM-u_Ga5YJFTL1JzCaqJsPFw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	"Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@gmail.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gmt Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:41:35 -0000

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:01:25PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 17 February 2012 16:45, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No need to set bump PORTREVISION here.
> 
> I did that here because then anyone updating all ports will be alerted
> to its BROKEN and DEPRECATED state.

If someone has it installed (with whatever local patching it required), she
would probably get sad with port revision bump, since it would require to
explicitly hold the package in pkgtools.conf from now on.

I agree with Philip here: port revision should be bumped if something is
definitely wrong with installed packages users might have.  Bumping port
revision for (officially) broken ports is bogus.

./danfe