From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Sep 23 20:18:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B694737B424 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0467C1A25; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:14:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:14:24 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Brandon Fosdick Cc: Trevor Johnson , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports tree idea: Combine DESCR and COMMENT Message-ID: <20000923221424.Q1054@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Brandon Fosdick , Trevor Johnson , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39CD491F.C0AE18F7@glue.umd.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39CD491F.C0AE18F7@glue.umd.edu>; from bfoz@glue.umd.edu on Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 08:21:51PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 08:21:51PM -0400, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > These all sound like good ideas to me, why didn't anything ever come of it? Because it would effectively double the size of the ports repository for the time being, and would make for a very long day for the person(s) who took up the job of repocopying all the files. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message