From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Oct 5 20:55:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA20157 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 20:55:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt053nb4.san.rr.com (dt053nb4.san.rr.com [204.210.34.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA20141 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 20:55:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt053nb4.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA07597; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 20:53:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <3619941C.6531D06C@dal.net> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 20:53:00 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE-0929 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sue Blake CC: Brett Taylor , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: thoteditor-2.1b References: <19981004205251.09260@welearn.com.au> <19981006111413.54726@welearn.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sue Blake wrote: > Hmmm, it's been catching people unawares in the ports collection for > every release since 2.2.5. Looking through the editors, this is one of > the more attractive looking ones that people might try first. Check the > -questions archives for the results. > > Of course I'd like to see it fixed but that's beyond my skills. > Do broken ports become immortal after 12 months or do we have a > euthenasia policy? :-) I'm confused. It compiles and runs just fine for me. What about it is broken? There is a 2.1e out so it could stand to be updated, but it's certainly not broken. -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** Go PADRES! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message