From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 12 22:19:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A55E316A4CE; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:19:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EDCEA43D45; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:19:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iACMHKc9033567;
	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:17:20 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:17:29 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20041112.151729.114732187.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: rwatson@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041112220719.26498C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
References: <20041112.150359.11373761.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041112220719.26498C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: usb with fast interrupts
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:19:38 -0000

In message: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041112220719.26498C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
            Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes:
: Sounds good to me.  Scott's comments on possibly wanting a non-task worker
: may well be valid, though.  Or you can do what acpi and other components
: do: use the task queue mechanism but provide their own kernel thread.

I'll do that if performance changes in any significant way.  Given
that we're taking GIANT out unconditionally anyway in the taskqueue,
I'm not sure that timing really matters...  It will matter more once
we push Giant further down into usb.

Warner