From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 23:25:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E21065679 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43068FC13 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-22-230-24.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.22.230.24] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeySH-00055v-Er for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:25:46 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:25:46 -0800 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:25:46 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20110117232546.GB4732@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4D34A6EF.30600@alokat.org> <7DC710B0-A2F3-4FAD-A308-05E9299E9188@mac.com> <20110117223838.GA4732@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20110117231742.GB40523@slackbox.erewhon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110117231742.GB40523@slackbox.erewhon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: harddrive encryption X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:25:51 -0000 --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Roland Smith on Tuesday, 18 January 2011: >=20 > Since you are making a backup, why not just run geli(8), newfs(8) the new > encrpyted partition and restore the data? I don't think it is much slower= , and > it is a _lot_ safer. >=20 That makes a lot of sense. I don't know why I had such a mental block about running newfs(8) on the partition. Thanks! --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://chipsquips.com | http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNNM/6AAoJEIpckszW26+RfMIIAK+nvmRxVRaBmkrmnUVga0S3 k3YJu529nCjWrIQn1DvRzWnq7oyhGlIw+ta94+2074lH3DaSi6zOotaKmkcq95Nw JDStkQvo70Qaci2wzzyE2wWl2Eku25Rw9eRQQ7fIl439vr4HulUQPvW4XTodSDmC 0c3pMKmKFK9+aYF+xJZL8GBvkr5SBON5KUs9FKjsZWpb39hd+y4edWx5+d5zjcPb GmhVYbedIpz+5Q0gMU1scSTpi2Nk4Lu5CHsufVtLfHvbRaoh3zdeCuL1PYUt35UD nvjwuzODS4CfvVd2VJPd31NMMK4+ZkzeYuM5Y9hQWGhWUVuxRfdR2arZqcR9NYs= =MH9/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP--