From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 23 13:41:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B515AC532E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from smtp.krpservers.com (smtp.krpservers.com [62.13.128.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.krpservers.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49EE2E96; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from [10.12.30.106] (vpn01-01.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.213] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.krpservers.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u5NDfAj8067079 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:41:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:41:02 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Michael Gmelin Subject: Re: Problem with VLAN config and traffic after 10.1-R -> 10.3-R-p5 Upgrade? Message-ID: <87C4B070AC631E5175831B3A@[10.12.30.106]> In-Reply-To: References: <2ED5D9FEB55641BF734C14F3@[10.12.30.106]> <2033B3FC769B74294656A089@[10.12.30.106]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:41:14 -0000 Ok... --On 23 June 2016 13:32 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > I use a similar config with vlans over lagg. While I haven't seen > exactly your problem, I did see one instance of the vlan interface > coming up with an all-zero MAC address (out of about 10 systems upgraded > to 10.3-RELEASE so far). See PR207701 -- my workaround was to > explicitly set a MAC address for the vlan i/f. Having just spent twenty minutes staring at MAC's on the machine - it *does appear* we are also seeing the same as PR207701. The machine has two lagg interfaces on it - I checked the wrong one initially (em based) - hence twenty minutes of head scratching and oh-so-long reboots (on HP kit) after I glimpsed one of them was indeed a MAC of 00:00:00:00:00:00 (which is on the bge based lagg vlans). I'll go read up on the PR, add myself to it, and implement the workaround. Sorry for the noise... Regards, -Karl