From owner-freebsd-doc  Mon Feb 19 10:20:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-doc
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA13817
          for doc-outgoing; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:20:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA13812
          for <doc@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:20:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA20872; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:19:42 -0800
To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
cc: doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "ports" handbook? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Feb 1996 11:14:26 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960219111113.2154B-100000@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu> 
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:19:42 -0800
Message-ID: <20870.824753982@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I'd say create a new section of the handbook for ported software and then
pester Satoshi or I to write a better description of the ports & packages
collection to head it up.  The MH docs can go into the mail collection
subchapter.

					Jordan

> I recieved a pretty good submission of document for MH.  I'm pondering 
> whether it makes sense to have the handbook be strictly for "out of the 
> box" FreeBSD, and have a second "nifty add-on" handbook, or lump them 
> together.  Of course, the forme could have passing references to the 
> latter.  
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -john
> 
> == jfieber@indiana.edu ===========================================
> == http://fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ============
>