From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 15:30:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A218816A424 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4455D43D55 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1AFUEEx095058 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1AFUEtr095055; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:30:14 GMT Message-Id: <200602101530.k1AFUEtr095055@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:30:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/93014; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Ben Kaduk Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:23:52 +0200 On 2006-02-08 03:56, Ben Kaduk wrote: > In the project model book, I found a few minor nits whilst perusing > its contents. > > One nit is the use of "to" instead of "too" on line 2209 of the source. > >Fix: > --- book.sgml Wed Feb 8 02:38:24 2006 > +++ book.sgml.orig Wed Feb 8 02:38:08 2006 > @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ > stability cannot be sacrificed by self-imposed deadlines and > target release dates. > > - For slips of time not to become too long with regards to security > + For slips of time not to become to long with regards to security > and stability issues, > extra discipline is required when committing changes to -STABLE. Hmmm, not really. The original text is ok. "too long" refers to the length of a time period. I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here.