From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 19:45:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF966C6; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3676B26D6; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A136438BD; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:45:15 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53EA6EBB.2010802@marino.st> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:44:59 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cy Schubert , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r364739 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/syslog-ng-devel sysutils/syslog-ng-devel/files References: <53ea6d76.6eb9.5599e7c9@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53ea6d76.6eb9.5599e7c9@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:45:34 -0000 On 8/12/2014 21:39, Cy Schubert wrote: > Author: cy > Date: Tue Aug 12 19:39:33 2014 > New Revision: 364739 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/364739 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r364739/ > > Log: > Reintroduce syslog-ng-devel for 3.6.0alpha2. > > Submitted by: Peter Czanik (syslog-ng upline) Do Ports really need alpha quality -devel ports in the collection? If it were up to me I'd purge 90% of our -devel ports. I tried to start a conversation about a policy for these with portmgr, but as usual, only one person responded. I'd still like to have that conversation though. This -devel port trend is disturbing. John