From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Nov 13 10:23:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA11725 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 10:23:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from natasha.wolfram.com (natasha.wolfram.com [140.177.4.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA11720; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 10:23:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from weingart@natasha.wolfram.com) Received: from natasha.wolfram.com (weingart@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by natasha.wolfram.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA00814; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 12:22:31 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: The Hermit Hacker cc: Alex Belits , Chuck Robey , Artur Grabowski , Tech1 , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, tech@openbsd.org, tech-kern@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Detailed info on Fail-safe cluster for Freebsd/unixes In-Reply-To: Message from The Hermit Hacker of "Thu, 12 Nov 1998 23:58:38 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 12:22:30 -0600 Message-ID: <2468.910981350@natasha.wolfram.com> From: Tobias Weingartner Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thursday, November 12, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Actually, I have to quickly agree with Chuck on this...I don't > personally want WordPerfect, mind you. But, I would be willing to pay for > a copy of StarOffice 5.0 if it were native to FreeBSD, since it would > effectively allow me to totally ditch any reliance I have on Winbloze... > > I wish there were a way of "convincing" commercial enterprises to > port to us :( Working in an commercial environment, where whole universities have asked for certain ports of the software, I can say the following. The companies are not just interested in getting something running, slapping it on a CD and shipping it to whoever pays some minimal amount for it. (I doubt you can afford the real cost of development. That might run several $100K for a decent sized product.) They also want to run it through their test suites, get managers to sign off on it, run it through SQA, fix critical bugs in it, etc. I doubt there are companies out there, who would release a flagship product of theirs, untested. It would have bugs in it, and would damage the reputation of the company... At least, that is they way most of them seem to think. --Toby. *----------------------------------------------------------------------------* | Tobias Weingartner | Email: weingart@Wolfram.com | Wolfram Research Inc. | | #8-1514 Grandview |-----------------------------| 100 Tradecenter Drive | | Champaign, IL | Unix Guru, Admin, Sys-Prgmr | Champaign, IL | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | %SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown | *----------------------------------------------------------------------------* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message