From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 4 10:20:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F219737BB9D for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from parish.my.domain ([62.253.84.191]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20000804172006.RYZS16423.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@parish.my.domain>; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:20:06 +0100 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish.my.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA01215; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:20:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:20:00 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: "David J. Kanter" Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with mutt port Message-ID: <20000804182000.A236@parish> References: <20000803203853.A16682@parish> <20000803211349.B23851@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20000803211349.B23851@localhost.localdomain>; from djkanter@northwestern.edu on Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:13:49PM -0500 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:13:49PM -0500, David J. Kanter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:38:53PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > > When it's finished mutt(1) is installed and working, but the HTML docs > > aren't. > > This has been a problem for some time. I don't know it doesn't get fixed. > > A partial fix is a patch that should be on the list achives. > If you are referring to the patch posted by Udo Schweigert on 12/6/00 in response to a post from yourself then I found it after posting my original message. FWIW it appears that they have been committed, although other mods appear to have been made as well: /usr/ports/mail/mutt{103}# patch -C < /usr/mark/mutt_makefile.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ru mutt.org/Makefile mutt/Makefile |--- mutt.org/Makefile Sun May 28 09:14:57 2000 |+++ mutt/Makefile Mon Jun 12 16:57:35 2000 -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n Apply anyway? [n] Hunk #1 ignored at 107. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Makefile.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ru mutt.org/patches/patch-02 mutt/patches/patch-02 |--- mutt.org/patches/patch-02 Sat May 13 19:31:09 2000 |+++ mutt/patches/patch-02 Mon Jun 12 16:52:09 2000 -------------------------- File to patch: patches/patch-02 Patching file patches/patch-02 using Plan A... Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 20. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ru mutt.org/pkg/PLIST mutt/pkg/PLIST |--- mutt.org/pkg/PLIST Sun May 14 16:23:34 2000 |+++ mutt/pkg/PLIST Mon Jun 12 16:58:00 2000 -------------------------- File to patch: pkg/PLIST Patching file pkg/PLIST using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 187. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to pkg/PLIST.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ru mutt.org/pkg/PLIST.htmlfiles mutt/pkg/PLIST.htmlfiles |--- mutt.org/pkg/PLIST.htmlfiles Sat May 13 19:31:09 2000 |+++ mutt/pkg/PLIST.htmlfiles Mon Jun 12 17:03:39 2000 -------------------------- File to patch: pkg/PLIST.htmlfiles Patching file pkg/PLIST.htmlfiles using Plan A... Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage. done /usr/ports/mail/mutt{104}# > As a note, I generally build mutt using > > make -DWITH_SLANG=yes all && make -DWITH_SLANG=yes install OK, but as I mentioned, compiling with slang causes a SIG11 core dump as soon as I press a(ny) key. Have you any idea why that is? In the end I just cp(1)'ed the HTML stuff from the build tree to the install directory. Still, a port should build without all these problems. If it is something missing or out of date on my system then maybe the dependency checking needs enhancing. > -- > David Kanter > djkanter@northwestern.edu > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- If I buy a copy of WinDelete, and it doesn't delete Windows, am I entitled to my money back? ________________________________________________________________ 51.44°N FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org 2.057°W My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark mailto:marko@freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message