From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 23 14:50:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D684938;
 Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:50:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown
 [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4A766A9A;
 Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:50:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBNEpC6W000910;
 Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:51:12 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com)
To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>, Matt Smith <fbsd@xtaz.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20141223135111.GA45509@xtaz.uk>
References: <CAJuc1zPtDsOQG2oAKoTVB+pVyox8h1mGZOW6CtMBw1GN7=vnOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141222094630.GF52267@xtaz.uk>
 <1419342257.1161578.206107753.2999EC08@webmail.messagingengine.com>,
 <20141223135111.GA45509@xtaz.uk>
From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
Subject: Re: gnupg & pinentry
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:51:12 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-id: <c3a98cd3db28250390c46275862214ea@ultimatedns.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:50:26 -0000

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:11 +0000 Matt Smith <fbsd@xtaz.co.uk> wrote

> On Dec 23 07:44, Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
> >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option.
> >
> >Anyone up for a weekend challenge? :-)
> 
> There has been another thread on this mailing list discussing making the 
> port honour the WITHOUT_X11 and OPTIONS_UNSET+=X11 options from 
> make.conf which would make it only depend on security/pinentry-curses 
> instead of security/pinentry. This seems like a good solution to me. It 
> would mean if one of those options is set it will only drag in a single 
> dependancy rather than all the X11 libraries and GTK.
A quick look @ the security/pinentry Makefile, indicates that the
request for this type of modification is trivial. It simply requires
reversing the (PORT_)OPTIONS logic -- this port could completed in
under 5 minutes. So unless instructed otherwise, I'll go ahead with
this.
One last question; pinentry-console, or pinentry-nox?

Best wishes.

--Chris

> 
> -- 
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"