From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 05:21:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69BECBA; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 05:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE35173B; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 05:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF23A43B4E; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:21:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540553AF.90608@marino.st> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:20:47 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r366937 - head/science/paraview References: <201409011932.s81JWEEJ016169@svn.freebsd.org> <5404CB26.8020803@marino.st> <2932435E-97B8-4C61-8EF9-0948B9A296E5@adamw.org> <5404CF42.2000902@marino.st> <20140902031831.GC51270@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140902031831.GC51270@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:21:25 -0000 On 9/2/2014 05:18, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:55:46PM +0200, John Marino wrote: >> done. I also rev-bumped it since LIB_DEPENDS changed. > > Bumping is questinable this time, no? As I read it, this port was failing > to build without execinfo. Doesn't it mean that there were no previous > packages with this version and bumping it was no-op? Nope, not questionable. Adam added it as an unconditional dependency the first time. execinfo is needed on some releases but not the latest ones, so likely it built somewhere. He wasn't specific. It was probably building before and a dependency unconditionally brought in execinfo that was later fixed. I think revbump was needed. John