From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jun 21 11:44:03 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA10848 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 11:44:03 -0700 Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi (root@hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA10824 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 11:43:49 -0700 Received: from shadows.cs.hut.fi by hutcs.cs.hut.fi with SMTP id AA18958 (5.65c8/HUTCS-S 1.4 for ); Wed, 21 Jun 1995 21:43:02 +0300 From: Heikki Suonsivu Received: (hsu@localhost) by shadows.cs.hut.fi (8.6.10/8.6.10) id VAA25228; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 21:43:12 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 1995 21:43:12 +0300 Message-Id: <199506211843.VAA25228@shadows.cs.hut.fi> To: Steven Wallace Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: Steven Wallace's message of 20 Jun 1995 13:55:49 +0300 Subject: FreeBSD 1.0 incompatability Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Otaniemi, Finland Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The tcsh for FreeBSD 1.0 that has worked great for me for the longest time now seg faults in FreeBSD 2.0.5. It only faults if I telnet or rlogin and use the shell. If I use an xterm there is no problem with it. The 2.0.5 tcsh works fine in both cases. Somewhere between 2.0 and 2.0.5 termcap was puffed up with more features, thus making most (all?) programs using curses/termcap to dump core somewhere in termcap routines, when big termcap entries like vt220 are used. -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@cs.hut.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4513377 fax -4555276 riippu SN