From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 13 13:57:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13557 for current-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 13:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ramsey.tb.9715.org (root@ramsey.tb.9715.org [194.97.84.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13552 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 13:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ramsey.tb.9715.org via sendmail with stdio id for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 13 May 1997 22:56:21 +0200 (CEST) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #1 built 1997-May-12) Message-Id: From: torstenb@ramsey.tb.9715.org (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 In-Reply-To: <7493.863510486@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "May 13, 97 01:01:26 am" To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 22:56:21 +0200 (CEST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > FreeBSD then diverge it will. I'm not willing to have dtmail broken > in this release and Thomas Roell cannot fix this "correctly" in the > time-span available to him, I first told Thomas that dtmail is broken on October 28 1996 and again on December 14 1996. In December Thomas told me that dtmail is too complex and he does not have the resources to fix it. I suggested to hire a consultant... -tb