From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 05:32:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA5D16A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:32:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mwinf0206.wanadoo.fr (smtp2.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4548043D39 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:32:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dak@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0206.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 2474C1800081; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:32:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.wanadoo.fr (ca-sqy-11-42.w80-8.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.64.42]) by mwinf0206.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C7EAE18000BF; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nebula.wanadoo.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.wanadoo.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i895Wuhf001101; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:32:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dak@nebula.wanadoo.fr) Received: (from dak@localhost) by nebula.wanadoo.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i895Wtwb001100; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:32:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dak) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:32:55 +0200 From: Aurelien NEPHTALI To: Chris Laverdure Message-ID: <20040909053255.GA1041@nebula.wanadoo.fr> References: <20040908223234.415D443D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1094669901.634.3.camel@elemental.DashEvil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1094669901.634.3.camel@elemental.DashEvil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Grover Lines Subject: Re: X.org 6.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 05:32:58 -0000 Yep! It could be great if someone posts a patch set to apply to the x.org port to update it to 6.8! Thanks in advance :) > > I'd rather not polute my system with files that aren't registered in the > package database. Since it seems to be so easy to get up, would it not > be similarly easy to modify the x.org ports? -- NEPHTALI 'dak' Aurelien TEK2 - Promo 2008 06.19.84.90.10