From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 05:19:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BB61DC; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAAE8FC0A; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBQ5JZgg055521; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:19:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBQ5JYDs055518; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:19:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:19:34 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Yuri Subject: Re: graphics/xpdf and graphics/poppler-utils share the same files In-Reply-To: <50D7B2DB.3050409@rawbw.com> Message-ID: References: <50D7B2DB.3050409@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:19:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, araujo@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:19:35 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Yuri wrote: > These two packages got installed at the same time (probably due to some bugs > in portupgrade/portmaster) and largely define the same files, many of which > have identical paths. See below. > Obviously, one has copied code from another not bothering even to uniquify > the file names. > This is obviously wrong. > Shouldn't one of them be deleted and all its uses redirected to another one? There's a note about this in /usr/ports/UPDATING, entry 20120511.