From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun  9 01:12:26 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA23015
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 01:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from TomQNX.tomqnx.com (cpu2745.adsl.bellglobal.com [207.236.55.214])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA23003
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 01:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from freebsd@tomqnx.com)
Received: by TomQNX.tomqnx.com (Smail3.2 #1)
	id m0yjJW2-00087JC; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 04:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <m0yjJW2-00087JC@TomQNX.tomqnx.com>
From: freebsd@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance)
Subject: IPFW problem?
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 04:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

The sample file to the contrary, it appears that ipfw will not
allow the "established" keyword for the "allow icmp" case.

Is this a misunderstanding on my part or a genuine fault"?

Is there another way to allow ICMP only as part of the TCP protocol?

TIA

Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message