From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  6 22:48:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: chat@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3191916A41C;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2005 22:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz)
Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9A343D5D;
	Mon,  6 Jun 2005 22:48:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz)
Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.157.226])
	by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j56Mme9H043014;
	Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:48:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz)
Message-ID: <42A4D28D.2010909@daleco.biz>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:47:41 -0500
From: Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050428
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
References: <42A491DE.7080701@daleco.biz> <1118095129.2131.13.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1118095129.2131.13.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Client controlled Network access ... any experience?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:48:44 -0000

Bruce A. Mah wrote:

>If memory serves me right, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'm looking at a situation which I imagine is common to many institutions,
>>in which I'll want to have a small LAN with full access to LAN resources,
>>but not allowing any gateway access unless a "supervisor" type person
>>authorizes the excursion.
>>    
>>
>
>[snip]
>
>  
>
>>Anyone with a brief word of Wisdom?  (Perhaps like, "what the heck to
>>Google for" ??)
>>    
>>
>
>It sounds to me like "captive portal" is what you want to Google for.
>These are commonly used to control access to wireless networks, but it
>sounds like this might be a good application for one.
>
>Good luck!
>
>Bruce.
>
>  
>

That does look promising ... thanks!  And thanks also for all
your work at re-eng and FBSD in general!

Kevin Kinsey