From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 26 10: 6:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D6B37B902; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:06:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03148; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:06:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Jeremy Lea , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for review: pkg_which. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:30:09 +0200." <44785.962015409@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:06:35 -0700 Message-ID: <3145.962039195@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yeah, I will say that pkg_info could get a lot more featureful than it is now without "exceeding its mandate." It would have been better than a profusion of tools. - Jordan > > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:57:00 MST, Jeremy Lea wrote: > > > I've placed the source for a new command, pkg_which, on > > http://people.freebsd.org/~reg/. > > Argh, yet another pkg_* command that looks (at first glance anyway) like > it should have been implemented as a feature enhancement to the existing > pkg_* tools. > > What is it that makes this unsuitable for incorporation into the > existing tools? > > Ciao, > Sheldon. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message