From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 17 6:42:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D13B37B416; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 06:42:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0043.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.43] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16FyyS-0005dA-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 06:42:36 -0800 Message-ID: <3C1E045C.2828C1E3@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 06:42:36 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nils Holland Cc: Brett Glass , Greg Lehey , "Gary W. Swearingen" , hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org, "Brandon D. Valentine" , Hiten Pandya , chat@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: IBM's intentions with JFS (was: IBM suing (was: RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD)) References: <3C186381.6AB07090@yahoo.com> <20011214122837.O3448@monorchid.lemis.com> <3C19807D.C441F084@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011214175450.02da2a90@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011215232233.00e74cc0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011216221810.031b6820@localhost> <20011217163427.A2885@monorchid.lemis.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011217001345.00e26280@localhost> <20011217111835.A43375@tisys.org> <3C1DDB26.62969FFB@mindspring.com> <20011217145322.A45210@tisys.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nils Holland wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:46:46AM -0800, Terry Lambert stood up and spoke: [ ... ] > > See above. For it to be useful, it has to be easy to use as the > > default FS. The IBM people recognize this as well, as regards JFS > > usage in Linux (see the IBM white papers for reference). [ ... ] > In the end, whatever gets done, I'd suggest that any unclear implications > of any futher move be investigated into beforehand, because else we could > face some very unpleasant problems in the end... These putative problems are predicated on the idea that the resulting code would be distributed as binaries, and I don't think anyone would do that for fear of the consequences. Remember that other people have other definitions of "useful". For example, this would be an incredibly useful project for someone whose sole purpose was to learn FreeBSD internals, particularly in the VFS and VM areas. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message