From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 27 20:50:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E5F233
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63A83A93
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:50:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7RKoKYL039001
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:50:20 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192873] [maintainer] math/asir2000 update
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:50:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-192873-13-NYACh9O8eb@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192873-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192873-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:50:21 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192873

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marino@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #5 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to William Grzybowski from comment #3)
> I don't like the idea of patches named patch-[ab]. They are non-descriptive.
> Any chance you can describe the file being changed or group all of them in
> the same functionality patch?
> 
> This is a personal choice and it may not be documented anywhere, so if you
> don't want to do it thats acceptable.


I would be surprised if it's not documented anywhere.  By now these old patch
names have to be nearing extinction so I'm not sure it's acceptable to
introduce new ones actually.

Saito, just rename the patch-[ab] patches with an updated patch and the PR can
get moving again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.