From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jan 9 03:55:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA20251 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 03:55:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA20246 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 03:55:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkb@shell6.ba.best.com) Received: (from jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.9.1/8.9.0/best.sh) id DAA14075; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 03:54:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19990109035423.A13514@best.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 03:54:23 -0800 From: "Jan B. Koum " To: Greg Lehey Cc: Owen Barnett , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD vs. FreeBSD References: <19990108230358.A19973@best.com> <19990109212815.B1743@freebie.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19990109212815.B1743@freebie.lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 09:28:16PM +1030 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 09:28:16PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 8 January 1999 at 23:03:58 -0800, Jan B. Koum wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 12:52:09AM -0600, Owen Barnett wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> I've been using FreeBSD now for a few months, but have recently read a > >> little about OpenBSD. All the sources I've read seem to indicate OpenBSD > >> as superior in security issues and FreeBSD in performance issues and > >> perhaps "friendliness" - I was wondering, if anyone has had experience > >> with both, what are the tradeoffs between each system? > > > > FreeBSD is as secure as OpenBSD. One can argue it is even > > more secure as OpenBSD was the last OS out of the two to have > > local 'get root' type vulnerability. Security also depends a > > lot on the admin of the system. > > I think this is rather a blanket statement. OpenBSD has a stated aim > of being particularly secure. I can't say whether they come closer to > this goal than FreeBSD, but you can't put them down on the basis of a > single datum. Likewise you can't claim the OS is secure based on a hype or a statement. > > > But you are right - FreeBSD wins in the performance area > > no questions asked. > > I disagree. I would ask questions, or at least answer implied > questions. There's been enough unpleasantness between the *BSDs in > the past; we don't want to start that again with a number of > unqualified statements, even if they should be correct. You do not think FreeBSD is better in the performance area? This is a simple yes or no question. :) -- Yan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message